Transcript 1000nalecture13rev.ppt
Unfinished Business
There are TWO classes this week – tonight December 4 (to make up for Remembrance Day) Test #3 webCT exam dates: Dec 8 (10:00) - Dec 13 (5:00) change in room: E610, E620 and E630
Review Question 1
You meet a 36 year old man who is a chain smoker. What might Freud say about this person?
A. He is fixated at the anal stage.
B. He is caught in an Oedipus complex.
C. He has an oral personality.
D. He has a phallic personality. Answer: C
Review Question 2
Rotter’s theory of _____ focused on people’s differing beliefs that their efforts will result in positive outcomes.
A. Personal control B. Personal constructs C. The locus of control D. The cognitive-affective personality system Answer: C
Personal Control
Internal Locus of Control
You pretty much control your own destiny
External Locus of Control
Luck, fate and/or powerful others control your destiny
Methods of Study
• Correlate feelings of control with behavior • Experiment by raising/lowering people’s sense of control and noting effects
Review Question 3
How is the study of personality different from the study of behaviour or biological processes?
A. One cannot use objective means to study personality.
B. The study of personality does not lend itself to explanation, only description.
C. Personality cannot be directly observed.
D. Personality is a false construct that has no place in science. Answer: C
Review Question 4
Which of the following is related to a higher degree of consistency in behaviour?
A. High self-monitoring B. Low self-monitoring C. Extraversion D. Neuroticism Answer: B
Review Question 5
The personality traits of shyness, fearfulness and anxiousness have been associated with a. The frontal lobes b. The amygdala c. The pons d. The reticular system Answer: b
Self-Concept
Is a cognitive knowledge structure schema (self-schema) network of interconnected knowledge about oneself cognitive aspect of self-concept integrated set of memories, beliefs and generalizations about oneself
Self-Schema
Self-Concept
working self-concept varies as function of: which memories you retrieve, which situation you are in, your role in that situation, people you are with etc.
Inter/Independent Self-Concepts
some cultures place greater emphasis on the collective self than on the personal self interdependent view self inherently connected to other people self-concept defined more by social roles and personal relationships
Inter/Independent Self-Concepts
some cultures place greater emphasis on the personal self Independent view self fundamentally separate from others sense of self based on feelings of being distinct from others
Interdependent/Collective Self
Advantages Disadvantages
Independent/Personal Self
Advantages Disadvantages
Self-Esteem
Evaluative aspect of self-concept
emotional response as evaluate different characteristics about themselves
internalize values and beliefs expressed by important people in their lives (“reflected appraisals”)
Self-Esteem
Sociometer theory (Leary et al)
humans have need to belong self-esteem monitors the likelihood of social exclusion acts as internal monitor of social acceptance/rejection is research support low self-esteem highly correlated with social anxiety
Sociometer Theory
Biological Basis of Self-Esteem
Twin studies - self-esteem moderately inheritable traits associated with self-esteem such as extraversion and neuroticism have genetic components serotonin levels affect self-esteem increased activity leads to increased self esteem/confidence
Maintaining Self-Esteem
Strategies self-evaluative maintenance exaggerate or publicize connections to winners minimize or hide relations to losers distance self from someone who outperforms them on task that is personally relevant biased comparisons evaluate self by contrasting actions, abilities and beliefs with others to see where they stand
Biased Comparisons
downward comparison contrast self with people who are “deficient” on relevant dimentions upward comparison contrast self with people who are superior
Downward Comparison with Past Self
Maintaining Self-Esteem
Strategies self-serving biases high achievers take credit for success blame failure on outside factors low achievers attribute success on outside factors blame failure on personal factors
Attitudes
“Evaluation of objects or ideas to indicate like or dislike toward them”
Attitudes develop through:
direct experience/exposure “mere exposure effect” classical conditioning advertising - pair positive image with product
Attitudes develop through:
direct experience/exposure “mere exposure effect” classical conditioning advertising - pair positive image with product operant conditioning rewarded for behaviour
Attitudes develop through:
socialization Would you eat a worm?
Heritability genetic predisposition attitudes towards death penalty, jazz, censorship and apartheid have high heritability components but not coeduation and straightjackets inherit physiological characteristics that lead to certain responses
Attitudes Predicting Behaviour
When more personally relevant the more specific the attitude is formed through direct experience in line with normative social values when expression does not lead to embarrassment
Attitudes Predicting Behaviour
implicit attitudes influence behaviour and feelings at unconscious level
Implicit Attitudes Test
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/ People possess dual attitudes: one automatic and unconscious one explicit
Cognitive Dissonance
(Festinger) Contradiction between two attitudes or between an attitude and behaviour creates anxiety and tension shapes behaviour and perception to maintain cognitive dissonance ignore behaviour that refutes/contradicts our beliefs accept uncritically info that confirms them
Cognitive Dissonance: Cars
Should the government be allowed to restrict car sales based on their gas use? P. 87 instructors manual
Cognitive Dissonance
(Festinger) motivated to reduce anxiety and tension change attitudes change behaviours rationalize or trivialize discrepancy
Which group experienced more dissonance? Which group rated the task more highly?
Cognitive Dissonance Worksheet
Dissonance and Cars
Arguments for banning gas-guzzling cars by those who agree with this position Arguments for allowing gas-guzzlding cars by those who don’t agree with this position -
Confirmation-Hypercriticality Effect
If logical, would evaluate the sensible arguments from each side and discard those that were ludicrous or just wrong Cognitive Dissonance theory predicts: will remember plausible arguments supporting own position will remember ridiculous arguments supporting opposing position Pattern supported theory.
Changing Attitudes
Elaboration likelihood model to explain how persuasion leads to attitude change -
Persuasion in advertising
Advertising to children Botox Cosmetics radio/magazine Ad
Forming Attitudes about Others
Impression formation attributions causal explanations for why events or actions occur basic need for order and predictability in lives just world hypothesis “blame the victim”
Attributional Dimensions
Personal attributions internal or dispositional attributions situational attributions external attributions other dimensions stable vs variable controllable vs uncontrollable etc.
Attributional Dimensions
Actor-observer discrepancy biased towards situational explanations when explaining own behaviour the bus was early; my roommate took too long in the shower; the traffic was backed up on Whoop up biased towards dispositional/personal factors when explaining behaviour of others he’s lazy
Stereotypes can be Self-Fulfilling
Interpersonal Processes
Chap 14
Fundamental Need to Belong Theory says need to belong is a fundamental motive “that activates behaviour and influences cognition and emotion” (p. 452 supported by anxiety felt when exluded social exclusion theory anxiety warns individuals may be facing rejection from group
Need to Belong
Social dilemna need to belong - cooperate which maximizes long-term interests selfishness - maximizes short-term interests “cheater detectors” abilities in social relationships/situations
Impression Management
Self-presentation - how we exhibit our personal characteristics before an audience differences in extent of self-presentation high in self-monitoring low in self-monitoring
Sycophant - groveling flatterer
Ingratiation
Groups Influencing Individuals
Social facilitation
Conformity
Two Influential Studies
Milgram’s obedience study Prison Experiment
http://designweb.otago.ac.nz/grant/psyc/OBEDIANCE.HTML
http://home.swbell.net/revscat/perilsOfObedience.htm
http://www.prisonexp.org/
Bystander Apathy
Kitty Genovese 38 witnesses who watched it happen none called police/tried to intervene Lethbridge
Bystander Intervention Effect
Diffusion of responsibility ambiguous situation (potential social blunder) anonymous vs identifiable cost-benefit trade off
Relationships
Proximity familiarity/mere exposure effect similarity admirable personality characteristics physical attractiveness
EARLY STAGE INTENSE ROMANTIC LOVE ACTIVATES CORTICAL-BASAL-GANGLIA REWARD/MOTIVATION, EMOTION AND ATTENTION SYSTEMS: AN FMRI STUDY OF A DYNAMIC NETWORK THAT VARIES WITH RELATIONSHIP LENGTH, PASSION INTENSITY AND GENDER H. Fisher 1 , A. Aron 2 , D. Mashek 2 , G. Strong 2 , H. Li 3 and L.L. Brown 4 1 Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA 2 Department of Psychology/ 3 Department of Radiology, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA 4 Department of Neurology & Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
INTRODUCTION
Early-stage romantic love is a specific and intensely orienting state, a cross-culturally universal phenomenon, and possibly a developed form of a mammalian drive to pursue preferred mates. Question: Is romantic love an emotion or a motivation? Bartels and Zeki (2000) did a similar study, although of longer-term, less intense romantic love. They regarded it as an emotion. We hypothesized that it was a motivation to acquire a goal, a specific mating partner (Aron and Aron, 1991).
Question: Is romantic love associated with dopaminergic systems (Fisher, 1998), as is partner preference in prairie voles (Gingrich et al., 2000)?
1 Specific group activations: Reward, attention and motivation (‘wanting’) systems Random effects analyses 2 3 Activity correlated with facial attractiveness (‘liking’) in the
left VTA
Activity correlated with length of relationship 725.27
4 Men and women tended to be different in a few areas A working model of parallel systems activation during intense romantic attraction
METHODS
Participants:
Seventeen (7 Male / 10 Female) right- handed neurologically normal volunteers who reported being intensely in love.
Stimuli: Photograph
of the beloved (
Positive
)
Photograph
of a familiar acquaintance (
Neutral
)
Count-Back
task (count back by 7 from…) (
Counts
)
Interviews
: one week before and immediately after scan
Instructions:
think about him/her, recall events related to the beloved
Questionnaires
:
Passionate Love Scale
(Hatfield and Sprecher,1986)
Affect Intensity Measure
(Larsen and Diener, 1987)
Imaging:
1.5T Marconi (Phillips) Edge MRI system
Voxels
: 3.75 x 3.75 x 4.0 mm, 20 axial BOLD and T1 images
Design:
Neutral (30 sec), Counts1(20 sec), Positive (30 sec), Counts2 (40 sec); 6 repetitions, 12 minutes
Data analysis:
statistics.
SPM99 for individual, group and correlation
Contrasts:
Positive Neutral
minus
Positive Counts
minus
8,421 Count Back By 7 C, caudate. VTA, ventral tegmental area. mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex. PC, posterior cingulate. p ≤.002, uncorrected except VTA, p=.01
The VTA response shown in the time course resembles that of dopamine cell firing to a familiar reward and withdrawal of reward. The nucleus accumbens was equally activated by the Positive and Neutral stimuli.
AC, anterior cingulate. PC, posterior cingulate. GP, globus pallidus. Inf fr, inferior frontal cortex. Our subjects in longer relationships showed a common effect with Bartels and Zeki (2000) in the cingulate and insular cortex. (Our study: mean 7.2 months; Bartels & Zeki, 28.8 mos
p
<.001) Our study and the Bartels and Zeki study showed a common regional effect in the dorsal caudate (data not shown).
C, posterior cingulate. CP, caudate. I, insula. OC, occipital. P, parietal. PF, prefrontal. S/F, septum/fornix.
SP, superior parietal. T, temporal.
Parallel cortical systems converge on caudate (e.g. Brown, 1992, 1998) where activity is enhanced by dopamine, thus attaching behavioral significance to the image of the beloved. Dark circles show greatest convergence in dorsal caudate and tail. (Diagram after Saint-Cyr et al., 1990. Dotted lines= caudate)
CONCLUSIONS
•
Early-stage intense romantic attraction is best categorized as a motivation system associated with varied emotions.
•
Dopamine-rich regions play a major role.
•
"Wanting" and "liking" may be mediated by different regions of the VTA, and also lateralized.
•
Women tend to show activation in regions associated with attention, memory recall and emotion; men tend to show activation in regions associated with integration of visual stimuli and sexual arousal.
•
Romantic attraction is an excellent example of parallel system activation, including convergence of corticostriatal and midbrain dopamine activity in the dorsal caudate nucleus.
•
This research may shed light on several medical and psychological disorders, including stalking and other crimes of passion. Romantic love may also be a useful tool in future studies of human reward mechanisms and memory.
Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love Love made up of three components: passion intimacy commitment see p. 480