quality assurance system in education: a country report, egypt

Download Report

Transcript quality assurance system in education: a country report, egypt

A. H. Barkawi Vice President, National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Education, Egypt; e. mail: [email protected]

Education in Egypt

Historical background of quality assurance

The Role of The National Authority of Quality Assurance and Accreditation / Egypt (NAQAAE)

Accreditation (process and decision)

Challenges and constrains

 Location: North East of Africa  Population: 80 million  Capacity of education institute: 26.3 %.

 Capacity of H.E. I = 28% (18-25 yr old).

 National goals = Expansion in HE to cover 35%. (18-25 y) = Developing technical education.

 Egyptian Government is committed to provide free education for all Egyptian people according to the constitution.

 Recently the Egyptian Government encouraged the private sector to invest in Education.

 Educational institutes = about 50,000 institutes  Students number = 21.35 million

El-Azhar Institutes (Islamic programs ) Governmental Institutes Private Institutes

• •

Governmental schools N= 36027 15.47 million (85.5%) 1.77 million (9.6%)

• •

El-Azhar N=8772

• •

Technical school N= 1081 0.05 million (0.2%) 1.24

million (6.7%)

Private schools N= 4841

18 G. Universities ( 325 collages) Al-Azhar University (64 collages ) 18 Private Universities (72 collages) Higher education institutes (100 ) 4 million students

 Quality assurance in education was one of 6 top priorities recommendations released from the National conference on Higher education reform (2000).

 Concepts of QA in education was introduced officially at the Government level since 2001.

 The development of quality assurance concepts and regulations in education passed through three phases :

Phase III (2007 – now) Phase II (2004 -2007) Phase I (2001-2004)

Phase I

(2001 – 2004)

• • •

Under MHE auspices .

Establishment of a national committee of QA to introduce and disseminate concepts of QA , support the implementation of Internal QA system 6 faculties were engaged in this project financed by Ford foundation.

Phase II

(2004-2007)

• • • • • • •

The beginning of full fledge of QA system Establishment QAAP, to prepare faculties for accreditation : Raising awareness & develop the capacity of the faculties in QA Supporting establishment of QA centers at the universities.

Supporting production of Universities strategy.

Prepared 140 faculties Issue the National guideline of internal quality system in higher education

 Started since 2007 by establishing the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Egypt

(NAQAAE)

by a Presidential Decree.

NAQAAE

minister is independent body belonging to the prim 

NAQAAE

is responsible for higher, pre- university, and Al-Azhar education.

 The main goals of NAQAAE are:  Raising awareness.

 Setting of educational & accreditation standards.

 Supporting self assessment studies.  Issuing accreditation certificates.

 An internationally recognized accrediting body, known for its fair and objective decisions, its leadership in quality assurance and excellence at the national, regional and international levels, while maintaining its Egyptian identity.

 To assure the quality of Egyptian education institutions, continuous improvement and efficient performance consistent with their mission statements and objectives , as well as insuring public confidence through independent, impartial and transparent operations.

 Respond to global changes.

 Reflect the country’s development plans, market needs and employment expectation.

 Co-operation with Regional and International sister agenesis to reach a mutual recognition.

 Cooperation with the stakeholders to set standards of accreditation.

 Acknowledgment of academic freedom.

 Provide impartial technical support without interfering with institutional QA process.

 Evaluation is based on assessment of learning outcomes.

 Phase I: education Setting the standards of accreditation and improvement in cooperation with stakeholders (2 years)  Phase II : Provide the technical support for educational Institutions (Technical advice, Training preliminary visit before accreditation) (2 years) and  Phase III: Accrediting Educational Institutions 16

 Lack of societal consensus upon the graduate attributes of each discipline  Absence of National Academic Reference Standards (NARS) to be used in programs design  No standards accreditation for institutional and program

Training Awareness

Capacity building

Training programs covers the areas of: 1.

2.

Strategic planning Internal quality assurance systems 3.

4.

How to write the self – study Peer reviewing

Raise Awareness of the Culture of Quality Assurance and Accreditation :

- Seminars and awareness campaigns - NAQAAE annual conferences - Public media - Issuing NAQAAE newsletter - Web-site (naqaae.org)

Institutional accreditation (Faculties)

Accreditation

University Program accreditation E. Learning programs

 Mission based assessment.

 Based on evaluating two main areas: - Institutional capacity - Educational effectiveness

Institutional Assessment (school): Institutional Capacity 1.

2.

Vision & mission Governance 3.

4.

5.

Human & Financial Resource Community Participation QA & Accountability Education Effectiveness 1.

2.

Student achievements Teacher qualifications 3.

4.

Academic Curriculum Educational Environment “ Institutional Assessment (Faculties): Institutional Capacity: 1. Strategic Planning 2. Organizational Structure 3. Leadership &Governance 4. Creditability & Ethics 5. Administratiion.

6. Resources 7. Community Participation 8. Quality systems management. Educational Effectiveness: 1. Students & Graduates. 2. Academic Standards.

3. Educational Program.

4. Teaching, Learning, & Resources.

5. Academic Staff.

6. Scientific Research .

7. Post-Graduate Studies.

8. Continuous Assessment .

25

 Outcome based assessment.

 Based on evaluating two main areas: - Program management - Educational effectiveness

Program management: 1. Mission and objectives 2. Leadership 3. Financial & physical resources 2.

3.

4.

Education Effectiveness 1.

Program Structure 5.

6.

Teaching and Learning Academic Staff Assessment of Learning Outcomes Program Development & Enhancement Indicators of success

E. Learning programs : Institutional Capacity: 1. Program management 2. Human, financial & physical resources Educational Effectiveness: 1. Program Structure 2. Teaching and learning 3. Students 4. Self- assessment and continuous development

27

 Strategic planning  Governing policies & its impact  Performance assessment and sustainable development To ensure:  Sustainable development  Improvement of Universities rank

 National Academic Reference Standards (

NARS

): Describes the minimum requirements to accomplish a certain program. It includes graduate attributes and characterizes knowledge and understanding, as well as professional, intellectual and transferable skills 

NORMS:

Resources (human, library, teaching facilities & physical resources) 

Code of practice

(accreditation standards)

1

• Reforming Educational Programs and courses • Determining the Intended Learning Outcomes

2 3

• Improving graduates competencies and competitiveness

30

1 2 •

Improving institutional capacity and educational practices

Improving the Internal Quality system

3

Accreditation

31

Capacity building Set standers Technical support

QA Centers Universities

Towards Accreditation

Pre-accreditation phase (Technical support) By NAQAAE team

Accreditation phase

By NAQAAE certified reviewers

 An optional process  Simulates the accreditation visit.  Confidential report  No decision (Analyzing the gap)

Self-study report Pre-accreditation visit Gap analysis Improvement plan

Faculties Programs University

NAQAAE Decision Institution self-study Sending the report to have the feedback Report draft Reviewing team (4 reviewers ) Institution visit (3-5 days )

 Accreditation: when the institute fulfills most of the standards of accreditation.

 Not – Accredited: when the institute doesn’t fulfill most of the standards of accreditation.

 Postponed: when doesn’t fulfill some of the standards of accreditation

(except Education standards ).

NAQAAE have channels of communications with national, regional and international accreditation entities:  Mutual recognition / alliance with ABET, JABEE  Cooperation with QAA (UK)  Acquiring membership of Arab and international networks for external reviewing and accrediting agencies 39

 Reforming the educational programs and courses  Developing the capacity of academic staff  Developing the educational resources and practices  Dissemination of quality culture 40

Название диаграммы 2008/2009 2009/2010

2009/2010

At University level:  Legislative constrains (lack in positive and negative incentives).

 Resistance of academic staffs to QA concepts, regulations and accountability.

 Shortage in financial resources.

At NAQAAE level:  Lack of engagement of NGOs and societal organizations on education outcome assessments.

 Large number of required trained reviewers.

 Quality assurance requires a real collaboration among all interested partners.

 Implementing the internal quality assurance system in educational institutes come in the top of priorities in the Egyptian strategy of Education.

Thank you

Questions?

46