February 27, 2014 - Energy Communities Alliance
Download
Report
Transcript February 27, 2014 - Energy Communities Alliance
Budget Update and Program Outlook
Terry Tyborowski
Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Program Planning and Budget for Environmental Management
February 27, 2014
www.energy.gov/EM
1
Click to edit
Master title style
EM Budget Update
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM
2
Budget Timeline: FY 2013
Click to edit
Master title style
Sep. 28th: Six month
CR passed
to
Oct. Click
Nov.
March 26th: full-year CR
(with sequestration)
edit
Master
Dec.
Jan. subtitle
Feb. style
Mar.
Jan. 1st: Congress passed
a two month delay to
sequestration
Apr.
May
Jun.
July – Sep.
May 15th: Reprogramming to
align funding within program
www.energy.gov/EM
3
Budget Timeline: FY 2014 Events and FY 2015 Outlook
Click to edit
Master title style
Oct. 1st – 16th: Lapse in
appropriations severely
impacts EM operations
Dec 26th: Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2013
signed into law
to
Oct. Click
Nov.
Oct. 17th – Jan. 18th: EM
fundingat $4.9B level
($700M below request)
President releases FY
2015 Budget
edit
Master
Dec.
Jan. subtitle
Feb. style
Mar.
Oct. 17tH: Congress passes
Continuing Resolution, ending
lapse in appropriations
Jan 17th: Full-year
appropriation funds EM
$208M above request
Apr.
May
Jun.
July – Sep.
Sep. 30th – Deadline for
Congress to pass an
appropriation for FY 2015
www.energy.gov/EM
4
FY 2014 Budget Passed January 17th, 2014
Click to edit
Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Congressional Hearing Room
www.energy.gov/EM
5
Temporary Relief from the Budget Control Act of 2011
Click to edit
Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013
Sets overall discretionary
spending for the current fiscal
year at $1.012 trillion—about
halfway between the Senate
budget level of $1.058 trillion
and the House budget level of
$967 billion.
The agreement would provide
$63 billion in sequester relief
over two years, split evenly
between defense and nondefense programs.
In fiscal year 2014, defense
discretionary spending would
be set at $520.5 billion, and
non-defense discretionary
spending would be set at
$491.8 billion.
Sequester relief in 2014 and
2015 is fully offset by savings
elsewhere in the federal
budget.
www.energy.gov/EM
6
EM’s Recent Budget History
6,500
$411M Funding
Reduction from
Sequestration
(dollars in millions)
6,000
Funding Increase in FY14
Omnibus Appropriation
Click to edit
5,500
Master title style
$319M Reduction
from CR Rules
5,000
4,500
Click to edit Master subtitle style
5,830
5,710
5,299
4,000
4,980*
3,500
3,000
2012
2013
2014 (CR)
2014 (Omnibus)
*Annualized funding level from the temporary continuing resolution
www.energy.gov/EM
7
EM Long-Term Budget History
Historical EM
Average
Funding Level:
$6.2 billion
$8.0
$7.0
$6.0
$6.7
$7.0
$7.0
$7.3
Click to edit $6.6 $6.2
Master title style
$6.0
$5.7
$5.0
$6.0
$6.0
$5.8
$5.7
$5.7
$5.3
$4.9
$4.0
$3.0
Click to edit Master subtitle style
$2.0
$1.0
$0.0
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY14
ARA
CR
Exec.
(Dollars in billions)
www.energy.gov/EM
8
EM’s FY 2014 Budget: Funding by Mission Area
$414M
Total Funding:
$5.830 Billion
$155M
*
Click to$442M
edit
Master title style
$2,007M
Click to edit Master subtitle style
$797M
*Includes Program Direction, Program
Support, TDD, Post Closure
Administration and Community and
Regulatory Support
$855M
$1,160M
www.energy.gov/EM
9
EM Funding by Site in FY 2014
Total Funding:
$5.830 Billion
Click to edit
Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM
10
Key Planned Activities for FY 2014
Click to edit
Master title style
Operational Tank Closures 5 & 6 – SRS, SC
Waste Shipment – Carlsbad, NM
IWTU Hot Operations – Idaho National Lab, ID
K-25 D&D – Oak Ridge, TN
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM
11
Click to edit
Master title style
Strategic
Planning
Initiatives
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM
12
Impact of Funding Reductions on Purchasing Power
$10,000
$9,000
$8,000
Current Dollars (Millions)
$7,000
continues to
ClickInflation
to
edit
increase maintenance/
support
costs style
Master
title
Remaining dollars
available for progress
continues to decrease
EM’s funding is divided
between two main
categories: The costs of
maintaining a safe, secure
and operations ready
posture (“Maintenance
Dollars”) and the costs of
performing active cleanup
work (“Progress Dollars”).
$6,000
$5,000
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Progress Dollars
$4,000
Funding reductions
disproportionately impact
“Progress Dollars,” since
maintenance costs are
largely fixed.
$3,000
$2,000
Maintenance Dollars
$1,000
$0
High maintenance costs
are driven in part by the
78 Hazard Category 2 and
3 Nuclear Facilities
managed by EM (more
than any other DOE
program).
www.energy.gov/EM
13
Path Forward
Complete evaluation of infrastructure
and maintenance activities in order to:
o Identify specific activities
o Understand requirements driving
those activities
o Compare information/best
practices across sites
Click to edit
Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Hanford River Corridor cleanup
Evaluate effectiveness of
improvements on an annual basis,
propose improvements to the
initiatives, and implement best
practices complex-wide
Idaho facility demolition
www.energy.gov/EM
14
EM Online Timeline
EM is developing a timeline that will show historical accomplishments at each site and tell the story of
the EM mission.
The timeline will be viewable at the complex level and will also be viewable by site, by state, and by
mission area.
Links to videos, photos, documents, presentations, and other materials for each event will provide a
wide range of historical information in one centralized location.
The timeline is not a static application and will be updated as accomplishments warrant. Planned, future
events may be added at a later time.
Click to edit
Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM
15