Transcript hep.ucsb.edu
US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project
Joe Incandela Fermilab Level 2 Manager US CMS Silicon Tracker Project
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
1
Si Tracker Group
• • • • • • •
Fermilab
•
B. Flaugher, J. Goldstein, J. Incandela, R. Lipton, P. Lukens, S. Mishra, T. Nelson, P. Rapidis, L. Spiegel, D. Stuart, S. Tkaczyk Kansas State University
•
T. Bolton, R. Demina, W. Kahl, A. Khanov, S. Korjenevski, W. Reay, F. Rizatdinova, R. Sidwell, N. Stanton Northwestern University
•
D. Buchholz University of California, Santa Barbara
•
C.Campagnari,(J.Incandela) University of Illinois, Chicago
•
C.Gerber,K.Papageorgiou
University of Kansas
•
M. Bailey, P. Baringer, A. Bean, X. Zhao A University of Rochester
•
S.Blusk,A.Hocker, P.Tipton
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
2
Tracker Consortia
•
4 Consortia:
•
Central Europe:
• •
All Forward Modules and installation in petals.
Final assembly of forward tracker.
•
CERN
•
Overall integration, general support structures, cooling and inert gas flow. Position monitoring and alignment. Mechanics, cooling and final assembly of the outer barrel….
•
INFN
• •
Responsible for Inner barrel modules (TIB) TIB Mechanics and assembly of the inner barrel.
•
USA
• •
All Outer barrel modules (TOB) and installation on rods assemble some support structures for inner barrel
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
3
Module
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
4
Rod
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
5
Wheel
Stereo modules are comprised of two single-sided modules. These are installed back to back with small overlap in z in a drawer like “rod”. Rods slide into slots in the C-fiber endplate system with very high precision alignments from one rod to next.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
6
Tracker Inner Barrel Supports
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
7
The Plan
• • • • • •
Build ~6000 modules Place them in ~750 Rods Fly them to CERN and install & test them Build the TIB cylinders and ship them to Pisa Help commission the tracker Analyze data
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
8
September Review
•
Project files:
• • • • • • •
Resource loaded schedule WBS dictionary Cost estimates Basis for estimate of each task Contingency analysis Institutional responsibilities Task managers Reviewed by PMG committee Sep. 14-15
• •
M. Crisler – chair Recommendations received and responses returned Nov. 1, 2000
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
9
Re: Specifications/procedures
Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : Project managers should work with the CERN Project Management Group to develop written specifications for mechanical tolerances, level of testing, QA/QC requirements and documentation.
Specifications and procedural documentation for CMS Silicon work: Sensors:
http://edms02.cern.ch/tmpfiles/edms_tmp_495864_specifications.pdf_dir/edms_tmp_495864_specifications.pdf
http://edms02.cern.ch/tmpfiles/edms_tmp_495868_quality_control.pdf_dir/edms_tmp_495868_quality_control.pdf
Module specifications, assembly procedure, and quality control:
http://cms-ul-tmb.web.cern.ch/CMS_TMB/barrel_silicon/Module_drawings/Main_ones_20-10-2000.zip
http://cms-ul-tmb.web.cern.ch/CMS_TMB/barrel_silicon/Module_drawings/All_others_20-10-2000.zip
http://hep.fi.infn.it/CMS/moduletest/ar/module_quac_2.PDF
http://hep.fi.infn.it/CMS/moduletest/wg.html
Module testing:
http://hep.fi.infn.it/CMS/moduletest/draft1.ps
Burn-in:
http://web.iihe.ac.be/cmspriv/silicon/Burnin/burnin.ps
The US CMS Silicon group has made numerous contributions to the specifications and procedures. See for instance:
http://hep.fi.infn.it/CMS/moduletest/wg.html
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
10
Re: Management
Committee Report, Section 1: Management Issues Recommendations to US CMS Silicon: 1.
2.
3.
Create an organization chart for the project with all L3 managers identified. Establish roles, responsibilities and authority for each L3 manager and each institution's CMS primary interface person, including budget authority and reporting responsibility.
Continue to refine the level of commitment of groups and institutions. Look to better define the scope of work and commitment for present groups and the possible addition of new institutions to the project.
Develop a signed MOU with each participating institution that clearly establishes responsibility and commitments.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
11
Organization in US CMS
Institution Fermilab UCSB Kansas State UIC Rochester Kansas Northwestern Interface to Institutional Responsibilities L3 Manager L. Spiegel Assembly infrastructure L. Spiegel Module assembly L. Spiegel J.Incandela
R. Demina C. Gerber P. Tipton A. Bean D. Buchholz Documentation & database Test equipment setup & maintenance Inner barrel cylinders Rod assembly Test boxes & wirebond fixtures design Shipping & receiving Module repairs at UCSB Installation & commissioning at CERN Dummy rods design Dummy rods fabrication Probing at KSU Wirebonding & simple repairs at FNAL Storage boxes Burn-in of modules at FNAL Module quality testing Testing boxes fabrication Burn-in cooling and interlocks Module inspection at FNAL Transport boxes design & fabrication Hybrid and module testing at FNAL Test equipment & instrumentation QA/QC at NU L. Spiegel S. Tkaczyk D. Glenzinski B. Flaugher J. Goldstein Technician TBD C. Campagnari J. Incandela J. Incandela C. Campagnari R. Demina W. Kahl R. Demina C. Gerber C. Gerber C. Gerber P. Tipton Post-Doc TBD P. Tipton M. Bailey A. Bean D. Buchholz
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
12
Physicist Manpower
US CMS Sillicon Tracker Total Physicists
1400 1200 1000 800 Available Scheduled 600 400 200 0 Q 1' 01 Q 2' 01 Q 3' 01 Q 4' 01 Q 1' 02 Q 2' 02 Q 3' 02 Q 4' 02 Q 1' 03 Q 2' 03 Q 3' 03 Q 4' 03 Q 1' 04 Q 2' 04 Q 3' 04 Q 4' 04 Q 1' 05 Q 2' 05 Q 3' 05 Q 4' 05
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
13
Institutional Manpower
Fermilab PhD
500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Q 1' 01 Q 2' 01 Q 3' 01 Q 4' 01 Q 1' 02 Q 2' 02 Q 3' 02 Q 4' 02 Q 1' 03 Q 2' 03 Q 3' 03 Q 4' 03 Q 1' 04 Q 2' 04 Q 3' 04 Q 4' 04 Q 1' 05 Q 2' 05 Q 3' 05 Q 4' 05 Q 1' 06 Q 2' 06
KSU PhD
250 200 150 100 50 0 Q 1' 01 Q 2' 01 Q 3' 01 Q 4' 01 Q 1' 02 Q 2' 02 Q 3' 02 Q 4' 02 Q 1' 03 Q 2' 03 Q 3' 03 Q 4' 03 Q 1' 04 Q 2' 04 Q 3' 04 Q 4' 04 Q 1' 05 Q 2' 05 Q 3' 05 Q 4' 05 Q 1' 06 Q 2' 06
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
200 150 100
UCSB PhD
300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Q 1' 01 Q 2' 01 Q 3' 01 Q 4' 01 Q 1' 02 Q 2' 02 Q 3' 02 Q 4' 02 Q 1' 03 Q 2' 03 Q 3' 03 Q 4' 03 Q 1' 04 Q 2' 04 Q 3' 04 Q 4' 04 Q 1' 05 Q 2' 05 Q 3' 05 Q 4' 05 Q 1' 06 Q 2' 06 UIC PhD 250 50 0 Q 1' 01 Q 2' 01 Q 3' 01 Q 4' 01 Q 1' 02 Q 2' 02 Q 3' 02 Q 4' 02 Q 1' 03 Q 2' 03 Q 3' 03 Q 4' 03 Q 1' 04 Q 2' 04 Q 3' 04 Q 4' 04 Q 1' 05 Q 2' 05 Q 3' 05 Q 4' 05 Q 1' 06 Q 2' 06
14
Re: Management (2)
Committee Report, Section 1: Management Issues Recommendations to US CMS Silicon: 3.
Develop a signed MOU with each participating institution that clearly establishes responsibility and commitments.
Response Have all information for Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs). Final SOWs and MOUs will be generated via US CMS project office software from the project file as soon as the project is approved and baselined. …then signed and incorporated into the US CMS project.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
15
Re: Technical Feasibility
Committee Report, Section 2: Technical Feasibility Recommendations to US CMS Silicon: Procure and commission a gantry system this year.
Response Ordered a gantry from Aerotech. Delivery date is Jan 2, 2001. All ancillary equipment ordered. Will arrive in early 2001.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
16
Re: Schedule
Committee Report, Section 3: Schedule Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : 1) Develop together with CMS management a delivery schedule of parts and identify responsible persons for the parts.
2) The TOB has to be installed first. Agreement should be reached with CMS management on setting priority on the delivery schedule.
3) Work out fallback plans with CMS on parts delivery.
4) Adopt a reasonable but aggressive schedule as the baseline that shows explicit contingency to account for delay in delivery of parts.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
17
New Delivery Schedule
2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Sensors Hybrids Frames 0 Q 3' 01 Q 4' 01 Q 1' 02 Q 2' 02 Q 3' 02 Q 4' 02 Q 1' 03 Q 2' 03 • In October we established a new schedule with the tracker group • TOB is ~33% of the total parts count for the tracker. We requested ~50% increase in parts delivery rate during production in order to create explicit schedule contingency. • The tracker group was able to do this since it represents only ~16% increase in overall parts flow rate.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
18
Tracker Task Managers
L2 Institution Bari Catania Firenze Padova Pisa Perugia Torino Sensor qualification G.M. Bilei A. Messineo M. Angarano Frames C. Van Der Velde A. Basti L3 Aachen 1 Aachen 3 Brussels Karlsruhe Lyon Louvain Strasbourg Wien Zurich F. Hartmann G. Gregoire J. C. Fontaine M. Krammer W. Braunschweig L. Van Lanker UK USA CERN B. Glessing APV25 J. Hall FE hybrids U. Goerlach J.D. Berst M. Reymond A. Honma Gantry (module mounting) G. Fiore G. Fiore C. Tuve' A. Kaminsky M. Biasini L. Van Lancker R. Haroutunian TBD L. Spiegel A. Honma Bonding A. Honma P. Tempesta E. Scarlini M Tessaro F. Bosi J. Clark W. Braunschweig R. Schulte H.J. Simionis F. Didierjean R. Wedenig K. Freudenreich W. Braunschweig TBD H.J. Simionis S. Vanzetto TBD J.D. Berst TBD U. Horisberger W.Kahl
A. Honma Reception & shipping project associate M. de Palma G. Gheri M. Loreti F. Bosi M. T. Brunetti G. Ferrero TBD TBD J. Martin
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
19
Tracker Task Managers (2)
L2 Institution Data Base & trace-ability D. Contardo Bari Catania Firenze Padova Pisa Perugia Torino A. Starodoumov L3 Aachen 1 Aachen 3 Brussels Karlsruhe Lyon Louvain Strasbourg Wien Zurich UK USA F. Hartmann N. Giraud L.Spiegel
module (fast) S. My A. Tricomi C. Civinini D. Pantano R. Dell'Orso A. Santocchia L. Demaria W. Braunschweig R. Schulte TBD S. Weseler S. Perries V. Lemaitre J.M. Brom TBD n.n.
M.Bailey
Tests module (long-term) rod/petal/shel/disk M. Meschini P. G. Verdini P. G. Verdini Rod/petal/shel/disk integration F. Raffaelli Sub-detector integration E. Focardi R. Schulte S. Weseler S. Perries M.Bailey
R. Schulte P. Bluem D. Contardo C. Gerber D. Pandulas R. Schulte P. Bluem D. Contardo B.Flaugher
D. Pandulas D. Contardo -
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
20
Parts Delivery
•
Fallback plans
•
The most likely source of delay is component processing within the CMS tracker group
•
We have now made preparations to assist in processing the parts we need:
• Pitch adaptor wirebonding on hybrids • Manufacture of frames • Sensor probing • Dummy rods
•
Finally, we have contingency to allow an extension of the module production period
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
21
Schedule at Review
Main Production Period: ~3 months of explicit float 22
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
Schedule Now
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
Main Production Period: ~ 8 months of explicit float 23
Re: Cost
Committee Report, Section 4: Cost Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : 1) Re-evaluate the cost of infrastructure (special environment control, burn-in stations), and engineering for ramp-up time.
2) Transfer the cost of an additional K&S 8090 purchase from contingency to the base estimate.
3) Contingency percentage should be calculated based on the Total Base Cost estimate rather than on the Total Base Cost for US CMS.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
24
Costs At Review (FY00$)
Task Name Miscellaneous clean room materials Machined parts Mechanical Assembly Equipment Equipment setup Wirebonding Machinery Burn-in Cooling system with interlocks Boxes Electronic Test Probe-station Miscellaneous instrumentation Sensor Probing Module Production Shipments to CERN Final assembly of TOB Installation and Commissioning of the Tracker TIB Support Structures Totals* Cost $60,000 $310,100 $170,000 $140,144 $66,000 $68,798 $115,000 $161,800 $57,700 $50,000 $53,640 $1,148,715 $100,000 $156,900 $216,000 $108,096 $2,982,893 Contingency $12,600 $99,232 $54,400 $99,274 $264,000 $29,583 $47,850 $90,608 $25,388 $48,000 $15,552 $643,281 $43,000 $69,036 $95,040 $57,654 $1,694,497 % 21% 32% 32% 71% 400% 43% 42% 56% 44% 96% 29% 56% 43% 44% 44% 53% 57% 520k$ of this is covered by the original barter agreement between FNAL and Int’l CMS
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
25
Costs Now (FY00$)
WBS 8 8.1
8.2
8.2.1
8.2.2
8.2.3
8.2.4
8.2.5
8.2.6
8.3
8.4
8.4.1
8.4.2
8.4.3
8.5
8.6
8.7
Task US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Components Equipment, Design, & Machining Machine parts Mechanical Assembly Equipment Wirebonding Machinery Burn-in Cooling system with interlocks Boxes Instrumentation Sensor Probing Modules Preproduction of 80 modules Assembly of 600 modules: ramp-up Assembly of 6000 modules Transportation Installation and Commissioning at CERN TIB Support Structures Totals
Price has risen 450k$.
Cost $3,429,715 $60,000 $1,600,528 $310,100 $268,281 $341,260 $133,812 $217,204 $329,871 $68,880 $1,059,312 $69,184 $152,495 $837,632 $160,000 $372,900 $108,096 $3,429,715 Contingency
$6,000 $99,232 $95,243 $45,240 $57,539 $83,661 $216,077 $38,573 $38,743 $85,397 $469,074 $100,600 $164,076 $57,654
$1,557,109
520k$ of this is covered by the original barter agreement between FNAL and Int’l CMS
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
%
32% 36% 13% 43% 39% 66% 56% 56% 56% 56% 63% 44% 53%
45% 26
Contingency
WBS Labor Intensive Task 8.3
8.4.1
8.4.2
8.4.3
8.7
Sensor Probing Preproduction of 80 modules Assembly of 600 modules: ramp-up Assembly of 6000 modules TIB Support Structures Totals Cost $68,880 $69,184 $152,495 $837,632 $108,096 $1,236,288 Contingency Cont/Cost
$38,573 $38,743 $85,397 $469,074 $57,654 56% 56% 56% 56% 53%
$689,441 56%
Contingency for labor remains a healthy 56%
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
27
Re: Availability of Resources
Committee Report, Section 5: Availability of Resources Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : NEW 1)The US CMS silicon project managers should work with CMS and with their own project plans to try and utilize the currently projected excess of available technicians at SiDet in FY01.
Response
• • • • • •
It is not possible to advance the production of modules. However, Engineering of the burn-in stand, test boxes, dummy rods boxes will start as soon as we are base-lined: , transport These will require FNAL technician manpower for assembly in FY01. We will soon setup the first gantry.
We will manufacture the modules . frames for mechanical modules We may manufacture the production.
frames for the first 80 TOB prototype The production of the first 80 modules will require technicians for assembly, inspection, wirebonding, and testing. We are working with INFN Pisa to advance the schedule for of the TIB cylinders .
production
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
28
Action Items
Action Items for the US CMS Project: 1) Develop a schedule based on reasonable but aggressive production rate assumptions and based on a realistic parts delivery schedule which shows explicit schedule contingency and schedule float.
2) Respond to the recommendations of this review by November 1, 2000 so that the project can be baselined
Response 1.
We have developed a new schedule exactly as recommended.
2.
We have submitted our responses to the committee recommendations on November 1, 2000.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
29
Action Item for FNAL
Action Item for the Fermilab Management: 1) Assure that there is a cohesive plan for the management, design leadership and fabrication of both the CMS silicon tracker and the Run IIb silicon upgrades for CDF and D0. Work with US/CMS silicon tracker managers and the CDF/D0 leadership to establish a plan of bow both sets of projects (CMS and Run IIb upgrades) will be accomplished.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
30
Comment on Run 2b
“The CMS silicon project managers have recently led CDF and D0 Run 2b silicon study groups. Our exposure to … CMS … enabled us to provide important new concepts to the Run 2b effort ... We will carefully consider the roles we can play in the Run 2b projects …after taking into account all of our existing commitments.
Many of the scientific personnel of the CMS silicon tracker group have interests in the Run 2b silicon projects. This is driven by physics interests... This situation is not unusual in our field. We have made every possible effort to ensure a positive synergy between these dual interests… We will make every effort to plan our activities such that we can use our expertise, manpower, and equipment in the most efficient ways, and to the benefit of both the Tevatron and LHC programs.”
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
31
Conclusions
• We have been reviewed • CMS needs us to build this outer tracker and we need to get started • We have prepared a good project plan with truly excellent and effective groups • We have responded to all of the review committee recommendations • A good project is now an even better one • We’re ready to go!
• It’s time to be base-lined!
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela
32