Transcript District State

12-13 EOY Reading 3D NC
Comparison Templates
The following slides contain a combination of state-level 12-13 EOY
mCLASS reports paired with blank templates that you can use to compare
your school/district Reading 3D data to state outcomes. You can populate
the blank templates with your own data by running your mCLASS
“Comparing Populations” and “Correlation/Effectiveness” reports where
applicable. For reference, please note that our data analysis indicates that
NC state performance tracks relatively close to national mCLASS
performance.
If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]
1
DIBELS Next Benchmark Comparison
(BOY-EOY 12-13)
The above DIBELS RAS Comparing Populations report reflects outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with
Reading 3D at all benchmarks in SY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slide #3, run this same report for your
school and/or district and enter the corresponding EOY percentages.
2
DIBELS Next Benchmark Comparison
(EOY 12-13)*
Percent of students in each DIBELS instructional category
(End of Year 2012-13)
Students at
benchmark level
Grade
School/
District
State
Students below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Students well below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Kindergarten
73%
16%
11%
1st Grade
66%
13%
21%
2nd Grade
71%
13%
16%
3rd Grade
66%
13%
21%
• * “State” percentages reflect all NC K-3 students assessed with mCLASS:Reading 3D at EOY 12-13
3
DIBELS Next Growth Comparison
(BOY>EOY 12-13)
The above DIBELS RAS Correlation/Effectiveness report reflects growth outcomes for all NC K-3 students
assessed with Reading 3D at BOY and EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slides 5-7, run this same report for
your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.
4
DIBELS Next Growth Comparison
(BOY>EOY 12-13)
BOY Intensive Students
Percent of students in each instructional category at
end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing well below benchmark levels
Students at benchmark
level
Grade
School/
District
State
Students below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Students well below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Kindergarten
45%
26%
29%
1st Grade
30%
18%
52%
2nd Grade
11%
20%
69%
3rd Grade
10%
15%
75%
5
DIBELS Next Growth Comparison
(BOY>EOY 12-13)
BOY Strategic Students
Percent of students in each instructional category at
end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing below benchmark levels
Students at benchmark
level
Grade
School/
District
State
Students below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Students well below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Kindergarten
67%
22%
10%
1st Grade
58%
20%
22%
2nd Grade
45%
34%
20%
3rd Grade
39%
33%
28%
6
DIBELS Next Growth Comparison
(BOY>EOY 12-13)
BOY Benchmark Students
Percent of students in each instructional category at
end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing at benchmark levels
Students at benchmark
level
Grade
School/
District
State
Students below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Students well below
benchmark level
School/
District
State
Kindergarte
n
89%
9%
2%
1st Grade
84%
10%
6%
2nd Grade
90%
6%
4%
3rd Grade
87%
10%
3%
7
TRC Benchmark Comparison (EOY 12-13)
The above TRC RAS Comparing Populations report reflects outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with
Reading 3D at EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slide 9, run this same report for your school and/or district
and enter the corresponding percentages.
8
TRC Benchmark Comparison
(EOY 12-13)
Percent of students in each TRC instructional category
(End of Year 2012-13)
Students above
proficient
Grade
School/
District
State
Students
proficient
School/
District
State
Students below
proficient
Students far
below proficient
School/
District
School/
District
State
State
Kindergarten
45%
20%
11%
24%
1st Grade
27%
32%
16%
25%
2nd Grade
34%
30%
9%
27%
3rd Grade
41%
18%
15%
26%
9
TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13)
The above TRC RAS Correlation/Effectiveness report reflects growth outcomes for all NC K-3 students
assessed with Reading 3D at BOY and EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slides 11-13, run this same report
for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.
10
TRC Growth Comparison
(BOY>EOY 12-13)
BOY Students Far Below Proficient
Percent of students in each instructional category at
end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing far below proficient
Students above
proficient
Grade
School/
District
State
Students
proficient
School/
District
State
Students below
proficient
Students far
below proficient
School/
District
School/
District
State
State
Kindergarten
12%
18%
15%
55%
1st Grade
5%
20%
19%
56%
2nd Grade
1%
12%
9%
78%
3rd Grade
4%
9%
17%
70%
11
TRC Growth Comparison
(BOY>EOY 12-13)
BOY Students Below Proficient
Percent of students in each instructional category at
end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing below proficient
Students above
proficient
Grade
School/
District
State
Students
proficient
School/
District
State
Students below
proficient
Students far
below proficient
School/
District
School/
District
State
State
Kindergarten
29%
27%
16%
28%
1st Grade
15%
36%
23%
26%
2nd Grade
9%
35%
16%
40%
3rd Grade
16%
23%
25%
36%
12
TRC Growth Comparison
(BOY>EOY 12-13);
BOY Students Proficient and Above
Percent of students in each instructional category at
end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing proficient and above
Students above
proficient
Grade
School/
District
State
Students
proficient
School/
District
State
Students below
proficient
Students far
below proficient
School/
District
School/
District
State
State
Kindergarten
64%
20%
9%
7%
1st Grade
41%
36%
14%
10%
2nd Grade
46%
34%
8%
11%
3rd Grade
55%
21%
13%
11%
13