Wheat Quality-Export Market-John Oades, USW

Download Report

Transcript Wheat Quality-Export Market-John Oades, USW

Wheat Quality Needs In The Export Market

North Dakota Wheat Commission County Representatives Meeting December 7, 2010 John Oades, Vice President U.S. Wheat Associates

Serving Your International Customers

As wheat growers you know the importance of your international customer base

On average 57% of U.S. HRS production is exported annually

Average HRS production is 13.0 MMT (478 mb) annually

Average HRS exports are 7.42 MMT (273 mb) annually

Columbia Grain

Wheat Movement to Export

HRS wheat moves to export by truck, rail and barge 35 tons 1,500 tons/barge Shuttle train: 11,000 tons

HRS Exports Movements

HRS exports: By mode and location Portland 57% Exports 7.42 MMT annually Duluth, Superior 13% St. Law.

.

5% Rail Interior 5% Huston, Galveston Barge/Laker 20% New Orleans

Knowing Your Export Customers

In a typical year HRS exports will go to more than 150 buyers in 30 countries

Question: Buyers on which continent import the most HRS wheat?

Answer: Asia (about 55% of HRS exports)

Question: Which country is consistently the largest (#1) HRS wheat importer?

Answer: Japan (1.59 MMT or 59 mb)

Question: Which group of countries is generally the #2 buyer of HRS wheat?

Answer: The EU-27* (962 TMT or 36 mb)

*Primarily Italy, Spain and the UK

Knowing Your Export Customers

Our Top 10 HRS Customers (5 yr. avg.)

– – – – – – – – – –

Japan: 1.59 MMT (59 mb) European Un: 962 TMT (36 mb) Philippines: 950 TMT (35 mb) Taiwan: 555 TMT (20 mb) Venezuela: 440 TMT (16 mb) Korea: 384 TMT (14 mb) Mexico: 298 TMT (11 mb) Thailand: 225 TMT (8 mb) Dominican Rep: 178 TMT (6 mb) Indonesia: 132 TMT (5 MB)

Knowing Your Competition

Your primary HRS competitors are:

Canada (CWRS)

Australia (APH)

– Kazakhstan (?) •

World markets are extremely competitive

Price, Quality and Service drive the market

– –

Customers want VALUE : The best possible quality and service for the price paid We are frequently “price challenged”

We therefore must provide superior quality and service to compensate for our higher prices

Customer Quality Demands

• •

Customers control quality through their contract specifications

– – – – – – – –

U.S. grade Wheat class/subclass Protein Moisture Dockage Falling number Vomitoxin Other (some non FGIS) Quality & quantity assurance provided by USDA/FGIS at the export elevator

Customer Quality Demands- HRS

• •

U.S. grade:

– – –

Most customers buy U.S. #2 or better A few customers buy exclusively U.S. #1 Many customers contract for “above grade” quality on individual grade factors

• • •

Test weight above the #2 grade limit of 57 lbs/bu Damaged kernels below the #2 grade limit of 4% Shrunken & broken kernels below #2 limit of 5% Wheat class & subclass:

– – –

Most customers buy NS/DNS

(min. 25% DHV)

Some buy exclusively DNS

(min. 75% DHV)

Many define a specific DHV minimum:

Minimum 50%, 55%, 60% or 65% DHV

Customer Quality Demands- HRS

Protein

(12% moisture basis) – – –

Most customers buy minimum 14% protein Some buy as high as 15% A few buy as low as 13%, usually in low protein years (like last year and this year)

Moisture (lower moisture = higher value)

– – –

Most customers specify maximum 13.5% Some specify as low as 12% Several are considering “price incentive/scale” specifications for lower moisture

Customer Quality Demands- HRS

• •

Dockage

(non wheat material) –

Dockage specifications vary greatly based on customer view of value and wheat cleaning capability at the exporting elevator

The Lakes and PNW export elevators have wheat cleaning capacity permitting specifications as low as maximum 0.3%

Gulf of Mexico elevators do not have wheat cleaning capacity, thus HRS dockage specs range from 0.8 to 1% Falling Number

– – (control for sprout damage)

Most customers spec between 300 & 350 seconds minimum A few will take lower FN’s around 250 seconds

Customer Quality Demands- HRS

Vomitoxin

– –

Most customers spec maximum 2 ppm Vomitoxin Some spec less, as low as maximum 0.8 ppm

Other:

– – –

Limit pesticide residues Limit mycotoxins (Zearalenone, Ochratoxin) Phyto-sanitary limitations: plant diseases, weed seeds and insects

– –

Thousand kernel weight minimum Gluten functionality requirements (more to come)

• • •

Farinograph values Alveograph values Wet gluten &/or gluten index

Japanese Quality Specifications- HRS

– – – – – – – – – –

Class/subclass: NS/DNS Grade: U.S. #2 or better

Sprout damage: Average not to exceed 0.3% with no sublot above 0.5%

• •

Scab damage: Average not to exceed 0.0% Heat damage: Average not to exceed 0.0%, no sublot above 0.2% Protein: Minimum 14.0% Moisture: Average not to exceed 13.5% Dockage: Maximum 0.3% (non deductible) Falling number: Minimum 330 per sublot Vomitoxin: Maximum 1.1 ppm

(at loading 0.8 ppm)

Treated seeds: No treated seeds Ergot: Average not to exceed 0.04% Residues: ppm limits on 229 chemical compounds

Italian Quality Specifications- HRS

– – – – – –

Class/subclass: NS/DNS Grade: U.S. #2 or better Protein: No sublot below 14.0% * Moisture: Maximum 13.0% Falling number: Minimum 300 Vomitoxin: Maximum 1.0 ppm

* This year taking mostly 13.5%

Taiwan Quality Specifications- HRS

– – – – − − − − −

Class/subclass: DNS Grade: U.S. #1

Sprout damage: Maximum 0.5% Protein: Minimum 14.0%, and some minimum 14.5% * Moisture: Maximum 13.0% Dockage: Maximum 0.3%,

Discounts apply: Dockage content 0.01-0.2% = 1:1discount Dockage content 0.21-0.3% = 2:1 discount

Ocean freight on dockage content to be reimbursed Fall number: Minimum 300 sublot average basis Vomitoxin: Maximum 2 ppm Aflatoxin: Maximum 15 ppb Residues: ppm limits on 38 chemical compounds

* This year taking some NS/13 in-lieu of HRW/13

Venezuela Quality Specifications- HRS

– –

Class/subclass: NS/DNS Grade: U.S. Grade #2 or better

Sprout damage: Maximum 0.5%

– – – –

Protein: Minimum 13.5%, and minimum 14.0% Moisture: Maximum 13.5% Dockage: Maximum 1.0%, all deductible * Falling number: Minimum 300 sublot average basis

Vomitoxin: Maximum 4 ppm

* This year taking 13.5%

HRS Protein- 2010 Crop

• • • •

HRS ‘10 crop average protein 13.7%

– ND ‘10 crop average protein 13.9% (13.0% LY)

HRS five year crop average protein 14.2%

– ND five year average protein 14.2%

Export demand is mostly 14% and higher Recent export market prices PNW Gulf NS/DNS 13.0 @ $392/MT $343/MT ($10.67, $9.32/bu) NS/DNS 13.5 @ $403/MT $357/MT ($10.97, $9.72/bu) NS/DNS 14.0 @ $440/MT $383/MT ($11.97, $10.42/bu)

It’s All About

VALUE

NDWC efforts in promoting quality in varietal development and production are appreciated

– Several states have developed “Recommended Variety List” based on wheat quality • Ratings based on multi year, multi location data – Growers are encouraged to select the best quality varieties from among those that are their top agronomic performers – This helps improve the overall quality of the crop without giving up yield • Thereby increasing Value to the customer

Varieties That Make Money & Market

GROWN & TESTED ACROSS NORTH DAKOTA – QUALITY & END-USE FACTORS * Variety

Alsen Barlow Breaker Briggs Faller Freyr Glenn Howard Kelby RB07 Reeder Steele-ND Vantage

Test Weight LB/BU

60.2

61.3

61.8

60.5

59.1

60.2

62.4

59.8

61.1

60.4

60.1

59.7

62.3

Test Wheat KG/HL

79.2

80.6

81.3

79.6

77.8

79.2

82.0

78.7

80.4

79.5

79.1

78.6

81.9

15.4

14.9

15.3

14.7

15.3

15.0

16.1

Wheat Protein %

15.4

14.8

15.1

15.0

14.4

14.7

* 2010 U.S. HRS Regional Quality Report

Quality Factors 5 Wheat Falling # Seconds

387

Farinogram Stability (Min)

11.4

394 407 457 392 462 375 404 398 397 408 404 351 10.0

18.1

11.3

10.4

12.9

14.6

10.4

9.0

17.9

9.5

10.3

14.4

Absorption %

65.8

68.8

66.9

66.9

64.4

67.4

65.9

66.1

67.6

66.0

65.3

66.5

67.3

Loaf Volume CC

1009 1000 1039 964 1013 1003 1056 1003 966 1054 968 993 1011

Ed-Use 7 Gluten Strength Description 7

traditional strong traditional strong traditional strong mellow mellow traditional strong traditional strong traditional strong mellow traditional strong mellow traditional strong traditional strong

Mill & Bake Quality Rating 8

            

• • •

Future: Marketing Functional Quality

Currently proxies are used to represent functional quality:

(dough mix properties) – Wheat class, protein, DHV – Current functionality tests to slow and complex

FGIS is working on rapid technology that will directly measure gluten functionality

– Gluten strength/extensibility

If the GCA is approved for “official criteria ” (optional) use:

– Customers could buy specific functional quality – You could be paid for that quality

Gluten Core Analyzer

U.S. Wheat The World’s Most Reliable Choice

It all begins with you…